Al Jazeera: “Obama
sets out tax rises for rich in budget: Republicans slam $3.8tn budget, which
includes tax hikes on wealthy and new jobs programs, as an "insult to
taxpayers"
and “CNN Obama budget: Tax aimed at rich”
It was very interesting watching
two videos that were on the same topic, but they were both so different at the
same time. Conjecture and interpretation really do play a big role when telling
a specific story.
Similarities: Both videos were
talking about Barack Obama’s 2013 Budget tax plans. In both videos, Obama said
that everyone should have an equal opportunity to succeed in America. He also stated that everyone should have a
shot at making it in America, not just the wealthier individuals. Obama also
stated that going to college should not be a luxury; it should be for all
people.
Contrasts: Al Jazeera interviewed Republicans in their video. The Republicans views and opinions were of
course going to differ from Obama’s suggested plan. Al Jazeera basically wanted to make Obama
look bad by having differences of opinion with his suggested plan. The Republican interviewed did not like or
agree with any part of Obama’s supposed budget plan. I think this is biased because
they didn’t interview a democrat. I
think they should have interviewed a rich democrat and seen what their
reactions and opinions were. Also Al Jazeera mentioned at the end that the rich
American’s would be a big threat to this budget and would disagree. Of course they would disagree; tax increases
would be aimed at them. The CNN video had no opposing commentary from any person
or differences in opinion. They made Obama
look and sound very good to people. He
sounded very serious about going through with this plan. I think the Al Jazeera video really just
wanted to make our president and government look bad for other nations
watching. The Al Jazeera video made it
sound like our government isn’t being run well.
In conclusion, I think both videos
differed a lot from one another, and that Al Jazeera really likes to cause some
controversy when they report on events.
Al Jazeera should not always put negative interviews in their
reports.
Nicole -- you have some interesting insights here and I appreciate your use of examples. First, please stop using the first-person voice for a while. Practice using the third-person declarative voice for your expository writing. Also, let's think more carefully about what bias is. Is it a matter of fact selection? Tone? Can we really judge the nature of an entire news network from one story? What is the difference between slant, bias, fairness, and so on? These are not easy distinctions.
ReplyDelete